Wood Property
Is there a smart property tax solution?

Is there a better property tax solution?

Need help with your apartment?

Surely there must be a better property tax solution. Previous sentiment of “no change”, is stating to thaw. It is interesting to see the arguments run, all of which may now be superfluous (including this one) however as we know, things change quickly in Canberra and State politics.

There are actually four property taxes that influence the market behaviour of property investors and home buyers.
The 4 property taxes are…

  1. Negative gearing (Federal & investment only)
  2. Land tax (State & all property over a threshold value)
  3. Stamp duty (State & all property sold – less for “off the plan”)
  4. Capital gains tax (Federal & investments only)

Each one has its hand on a lever that impacts the market. Different governments control different levers so I doubt we are ever going to get a smart and economically productive solution to property taxes.

The impact of previous policies to remove negative gearing and adjusting CGT, depends on the detail such as…

  •    Is it removed just on property or all asset investments?
  •    Is it just residential property?
  •    What kind of residential property – new or existing?
  •    Will be grandfathered for existing arrangements?

Subject to answering these, the impact of changes to negative gearing on capital or rental values would depend upon the level of interest rates at the time. It will however, be most pronounced on smaller or “investment” apartments which appeal almost exclusively to investors.

Focusing just on this sector the popular belief is removing negative gearing would make property investment less attractive, making prices fall and new supply less. This would force rents to rise in response to the reduced supply. This is thought to encourage some renters to become owner-occupiers, stabilising the market.

There is a view that if rental values rose, so should capital values, but the taxation landscape has changed in this scenario, and there is a new valuation paradigm requiring a higher yield. (income to value ratio)

One wrinkle in this argument is the supply of new apartments has about a 1-2 year supply lag. Therefore, any tax change would take about 1 – 2 years to materialise. The property market has longer cycles than most governments (let along Prime Ministers). The other stretch logic is that renters will become buyers. Remember a renter needs about a full years rent just to pay stamp duty plus the equity of 20% (or more if the market is falling and banks are tightening up), so this won’t happen in any significant way.

If we follow world trends, negative gearing will be eventually be reduced in Australia one day.

Share your thoughts or questions

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Need help with your apartment?

Apartments Made Easy

Written by a 4th generation real estate agent Apartments Made Easy gives you the tools and tells you all you need to know about how to buy, sell, own, lease, and manage your apartment successfully.

Recent Posts

Need help with your apartment?